Ni-NTA

The term Ni-NTA (Nickel NTA) refers to a nickel²⁺ ion that has been coupled to Nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA). Ni-NTA can then be coupled to agarose resin or magnetic beads for IMAC (Immobilized Metal Chelate Affinity Chromatography). This is a purification method to obtain functional His-tagged protein. The size of the used agarose resin beads or magnetic beads influences the flow rates and the protein yield.

Overview of Cube Biotech's Ni-NTA products for His-tag protein purification.

Ni-NTA agarose (40 µm)	Ni-NTA agarose (40 µm) Cartridge	Ni-NTA Magnetic Beads
Ni-NTA agarose (100 µm)	Ni-NTA agarose (40 µm) COMPACT Cartridge	Ni-NTA MagBeads XL
Ni-NTA agarose XL	Ni-NTA agarose (100 µm) Cartridge
	Ni-NTA agarose (100 µm) COMPACT Cartridge
	His-tag protein purification support products
	Penta - His Antibody for western blots

Get a free sample

---

Features

Usage	Specific binding and purification of 6x His-tagged proteins
Specifity	Affinity to His-tagged proteins
Binding capacity	>80 mg/mL
Chelator stability	Stable in buffer containing 10 mM DTT and 1 mM EDTA
Bead Ligand	Ni-NTA

 

Ni-NTA products by Cube Biotech were used in the following publications:

 

Protein	Year	Author	Ni-NTA product
Plasmodium falciparum 6- phosphogluconate dehydrogenase	2018	Haeussler, K., Fritz-Wolf, K., Reichmann, M., Rahlfs, S., & Becker, K. 1	Ni-NTA agarose (40 µm)
mCherry protein	2018	Wang, X., Liu, Y., Liu, J., & Chen, Z. 2	Ni-NTA agarose (40 µm)
Channelrhodopsin 2	2017	Volkov, O., Kovalev, K., Polovinkin, V., Borshchevskiy, V., Bamann, C., Astashkin, R., & Büldt, G. 3	Ni-NTA agarose (40 µm)
Geobacillus sp. Manganese catalase	2017	Li, H. C., Yu, Q., Wang, H., Cao, X. Y., Ma, L., & Li, Z. Q. 4	Ni-NTA agarose (40 µm)
Diacylglycerol kinase	2016	Rues, R. B., Henrich, E., Boland, C., Caffrey, M., & Bernhard, F. 5	Ni-NTA agarose (40 µm)
Glutamyl (aspartyl) specific aminopeptidase	2016	Stressler, T., Ewert, J., Merz, M., Funk, J., Claaßen, W., Lutz-Wahl, S., & Fischer, L. 6	Ni-NTA agarose (40 µm)
Histidine kinase domain of Ethylene Response Sensor 1	2016	Hsieh, Y. L., Lu, C. F., Chiang, B. Y., Liao, S. C., Chen, R. P. Y., Lin, C. S., ... & Yang, C. C. 7	Ni-NTA agarose (40 µm)
Arylsulfatase from Kluyveromyces lactis	2018	Stressler, T., Reichenberger, K., Glück, C., Leptihn, S., Pfannstiel, J., Swietalski, P., & Fischer, L. 8	Ni-NTA agarose (40 µm)
PepA from Lactobacillus delbrueckii	2017	Ewert, J., Glück, C., Strasdeit, H., Fischer, L., & Stressler, T. 9	Ni-NTA agarose (40 µm)
CagL	2019	Buß M., Tegtmeyer., Schnieder J., Dong X., Li J., Springer T.A., Backert S., Niemann H.H.10	Ni-NTA agarose (40 µm)
eIF3B2; eIF4A2; eIFiso4G1 and eIFiso4G2	2018	Cho H.-Y., Lu M.-Y. J., Shih M-C.11	Ni-NTA agarose (40 µm)
PvG6PD	2019	Haessler K., Berneburg I., Jortzik E., Hahn J., Rahbari M., Schulz N., Preuss J., Zapol'skii V.A., Bode L., Pinkerton A.B., Kaufmann D.E., Rahlfs S., Becker K.,12	Ni-NTA agarose (40 µm)
flavin-dependent tryptophan 6-halogenase Thal	2018	Moritzer A.-C., Minges H., Prior T., Frese M., Seewald N., Niemann H.H.13	Ni-NTA agarose (40 µm)
HrpII	2017	Bauer W.S., Richardson K.A., Adams N.M., Ricks K.M., Gasperino D.J., Ghionea S.J., Rosen M., Nichols K.P., Weigl B.H., Haselton F.R., Wright D.W., 14	Ni-NTA agarose (40 µm)
Human serotonin transporter	2019	Worms D., Maertens B., Kubicek J., Subhramanyam U.K.T., Labahn J.15	Ni-NTA agarose (40 µm)
CagL variants	2019	Buß M., Tegtmeyer N., Schnieder J., Dong X., Li J., Springer T.A., Backert S., Niemann H.H.16	Ni-NTA agarose (40 µm)
AtEDS1	2019	Voß M., Tölzer C., Bhandari D., Parker J., Niefind K.17	Ni-NTA agarose (40 µm)
PMMoV-CP	2019	Phatsaman T., Hongprayoon R., Wasee S.17	Ni-NTA agarose (40 µm)
Metal Binding Phages	2019	Matys S., Schönberger N., Lederer F., Pollmann K.18	Ni-NTA agarose (40 µm)
EH1	2018	Coscolín C., Beloqui A., Martínez-Martínez M., Bergiela., Santiago G., Blanco R-M., Delaittre G., Márquez-Álvarez C., Ferrer M., 19	Ni-NTA MagBeads
HRP2	2017	Bauer W-S., Kimmel D-W., Adams N-M., Gibson L-E., Scharr T-F., Richardson K-A., Conrad J-A., Matakala H-K., Haselton F-R., Wright D-W., 20	Ni-NTA MagBeads
HFITC	2016	Scherr T-F., Ryskoski H-B., Adithya S., Ricks K-M., Adams, N-M., Wright D.-W., Haselton F-R.,21	Ni-NTA MagBeads
Several Proteins	2019	Yang M.; Yang S-X.; Liu Z-M.; Li N-N.; Li L.; Mou Hai-Jin.23	Ni-NTA (40µm) Cartridge
PepA	2017	Ewert J., Glück C., Strasdeit H., Fischer L., Stressler T.24	Ni-NTA (40µm) Cartridge
Arylsulfatase variants	2018	Stressler T., Reichenberger K., Glück C., Lephtin S., Pfannstiel J., Swietalski P., Kuhn A., Seitl I., Fischer L.25	Ni-NTA (40µm) Cartridge
recombinant alginate lyase	2019	Yang M., Li N., Yang S., Yu Y., Han Z., Li L., Mou H.26	Ni-NTA (40µm) Cartridge
Phosphorylated Tau protein	2020	Wang H., Zhang J., Dou F., Zhijun C.27	Ni-NTA (40µm) Cartridge
AofleA	2020	Tian D., Zhang L., Zhang S., Kong X., Sheng K., Wang J., Zhang M., Wang Y.28	Ni-NTA (40µm) Cartridge
cysteine-less split intein	2019	Bhagawati M., Terhorst T., Füsser F., Hoffmann S., Pasch T., Pietrokovski S., Mootz H.28	Ni-NTA (40µm) Agarose
IFNb	2020	Mears, H.V., & Sweeney T.R.29	Ni-NTA (100µm) Agarose
Several different proteins	2020	Casas M.G., Stargargt P., Marihofer J., Wiltschi B.30	Ni-NTA (40µm) Agarose
Helirhodopsin 48C12	2020	Kovalev K., Volkov D., Astashkin R., Alekseev A., Gushchin I., Haro-Moreno J.M., Chizhov I., Siletsky S., mamedov M., Rogachev A.V., Balandin T., Borshchevskiy V., Nopov A.N., Bourenkov G.P., Bamberg E., Rodriguez-Valera F., Büldt G., Gordeliy., 31	Ni-NTA (40µm) Agarose
BMP-7 CPLX	2021	Furlan A.G., Spanou C.E.S., Godwin A.R.F., Wohl A.P., Zimmermann L-M A., Imhof T., Koch M., Baldock C., Sengle G.32	Ni-NTA (40µm) Agarose
Multiple proteins	2021	Mayerthaler F., Feldberg A.-L., Alfermann J., Sun X., Steinchen W., Yang H., Mootz H.D.33	Ni-NTA (40µm) Agarose
	2021	Lukas P.34	Ni-NTA (100 µm) Agarose
emST	2021	Weihou G.35	Ni-NTA agarose(40 µm)
LEXSY	2021	Zabelskii D., Dmitrieva N., Volkov O., Shevchenko V., Kovalev K., Balandin T., Dmytro S., Astashkin R., Zinovev E., Alekseev A., Round E., Polovinkin V., Chizhov I., Rogachev A., Okhrimenko I., Borshchevskiy V., Chupin V., Büldt G., Yutin N., Bamberg E., Koonin E., Valentin G.36	Ni-NTA agarose (40 µm)
LEXSY	2021	Huang C-J., Narasimha G. V., Chen Y-C., Chen J-K., Dong G-C.37	Ni-NTA MagBeads (40 µm)
LEXSY	2021	Schwäbe F.V., Peter E.K., Taft M.H., Manstein D.J38	Ni-NTA Agarose (100 µm)
ApoE	2021	Xue T., Ji J., Sun Y., Huang X., Cai Z., Yang J., Guo W., Guo R., Cheng H., Sun X.39	Ni-NTA Agarose (40 µm)
Interferon lambda	2021	Kolářová L., Zahnradník J., Huličiak M., Mikulecký P., Peleg Y., Shemesh M., Schreiber G., Schneider B.40	Ni-NTA Agarose (40 µm)
NEDD8 and NAE1/UBA3	2021	Zhou et al.41	Ni-NTA Agarose (40 µm)
pSu9-DHFR	2022	Maruszczak K.K., Jung M., Rasool S., Trempe J-F., Rapaport D.42	Ni-NTA Cartridge (40 µm)
cBag and C90	2022	Drwesh L., Heim B., Graf M., Kehr L., Hansen-Palmus L., Franz-Wachtel M., Macek B., Kalbacher H.43	Ni-NTA Agarose (40 µm)
Cytoskeletal actin	2022	Greve J.N., Schwäbe F.V., Pokrant T., Faix J., Donato N.D., Taft M.H., Manstein D.J.44	Ni-NTA Agarose (40 µm)
Cytoskeletal actin	2022	Veronica Teresa Ober 45	Ni-NTA Agarose (40 µm)
Several His-tagged proteins	2022	Bagavant H., Cizio K., Araszkiewicz A.M., Papinska J.A., Garman L., Li G., Pezant N., Drake W. Montgomery C.G., Deshmukh U.46	Ni-NTA Agarose (40 µm)
Several His-tagged proteins	2022	Maruszczak K.K., Jung M., Rasool S., Trempe J-F., Rapaport D.47	Ni-NTA Cartridge (40 µm)
recEm95s	2022	Kronenberg P.A., Deibel A., Gottstein B., Grimm F., Müllhaupt B., zu Schwabedissen C.M., Aibaev G., Usubalieva J., Siles-Lucas M., Pepe P., Rinaldi L., Spiliotis :, Wang J., Müller N., Torgerson P.R., Deplazes P.48	Ni-NTA MagBeads (30 µm)
bo3 oxidase	2022	Deutschmann S.49	Ni-NTA Agarose (100 µm)
Recombinant HIV-1 proteins	2022	Márió M. .50	Ni-NTA MagBeads (30 µm)
atEDS1, PAD4 variants and vvPAD4	2022	Voß M.50	Ni-NTA Agarose (40 µm)

Different metal ions confer different binding affinity and specificity

Fig. 1: Depending on which metal ion is coupled to NTA the balance between protein yield and purification specificity shifts. Nickel is a very balanced choice between the two extremes.

His-tag purification is based on ionic interactions of a coupled metal ion and the Poly-His-tag. Therefore other metal ions can also fullfill the function of Nickel. Figure 1 shows the most frequently used metal ions for His-tag purification. Depending on the used metal ion the balance between the specificity and the affinity of the metal ion to the His-tag shifts. Nickel is a balanced choice between both extremes. Copper has the highest affinity, but Cobalt is the choice for the most pure His-tag purifications.

 

Fig. 2: Over 20% more yield obtained with PureCube Ni-NTA Agarose. SDS-PAGE of GFP expressed in E. coli and purified in gravity columns with PureCube Ni-NTA Agarose and Ni-NTA resin from Competitor Q. 80 mg/mL protein yield was obtained with PureCube Ni-NTA Agarose (E1–E4, Cube) compared to 65 and 48 mg/mL, respectively, with the widely used alternative resins G and Q (E1–E4, Competitor G / Competitor Q).

 

High yield and purity

Our unique production process yields a Ni-NTA Agarose that exhibits a protein binding capacity >20% higher than that of two leading competitor products. Figure 1 shows the SDS-PAGE of GFP expressed in E. coli and purified in gravity colums with PureCube Ni-NTA Agarose and the Ni-NTA resin from Competitor G and Competitor Q. The protein yield in 4 elutions (E1-E4, Cube) was 80 mg/mL, compared to 65 and 48 mg/mL obtained with the alternative resins (E1-E4, Competitor G, Competitor Q). Similar results (10-18% higher binding capacity; data not shown here) were obtained comparing the purification of JNK1 (Kinase, 48 kDa) on PureCube Ni-NTA and the Ni-NTA of leading providers.

 

Fig. 3: NTA is robust in the presence of reducing and chelating agents. GFP-His was purified on gravity columns containing PureCube Ni-NTA Agarose after exposing the resin for 1 h to 3 concentrations of DTT or EDTA. NTA exhibits a shallow decay rate in binding capacity.

 

Superior DTT and EDTA stability

PureCube Ni-NTA Agarose is very robust in the presence of DTT and EDTA. In a stability test, PureCube Ni-NTA Agarose was exposed to increasing concentrations of DTT or EDTA for 1 h. Thereafter, the resins were used to purify E. coli-expressed GFP-His in gravity columns. The binding capacity of the resin decreased in the presence of both DTT and EDTA but the decay rate was shallow. In presence of DTT, PureCube Ni-NTA Agarose lost on average 8% binding capacity with each increase in DTT concentration, resulting in an overall decay of 22% at 10 mM. Even at 1.5 mM EDTA, the resin still exihibits 54% of its maximum binding capacity (Fig. 2).

Note: If EDTA and/or DTT stability are of upmost importance to you, we recommend our in-house developed Ni-INDIGO products instead of Ni-NTA. In-house at Cube Biotech INDIGO products have completely replaced Ni-NTA.

 

Fig. 4: PureCube Ni-NTA Agarose is robust against oxidation and regenerable. PureCube Ni-NTA Agarose was exposed to 5mM DTT for 1 h (A). After demonstrating that it could still bind GFP (B), the resin was washed, stripped (C), and reloaded with Ni2+ (D) following standard Cube protocol (see Cube Protocols & Datasheets).

 

Robust against oxidation and regenerable

PureCube Ni-NTA Agarose retains its color and function after exposure to as much as 10 mM DTT. Figure 3 shows a photo series of the resin after a 1 h exposure to 5 mM DTT. Unlike other resins, PureCube Ni-NTA Agarose did not turn brown (A). The resin was still able to bind GFP (B), with a measured binding capacity of 65 mg/mL (see Fig. 2). The resin could then be regenerated by stripping the NTA, turning the resin white (C), and reloading it with nickel ions (D). The protocol for regenerating PureCube Ni-NTA Agarose can be downloaded.

References:

1. Haeussler, Kristina, et al. "Characterization of Plasmodium falciparum 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase as an antimalarial drug target." Journal of molecular biology 430.21 (2018): 4049-4067.
2. Wang, Xiaoliang, et al. "Protein–Polymer Microcapsules for PCR Technology." ChemBioChem 19.10 (2018): 1044-1048.
3. Volkov, Oleksandr, et al. "Structural insights into ion conduction by channelrhodopsin 2." Science 358.6366 (2017): eaan8862.
4. Li, Hai-Chao, et al. "A New Homo-Hexamer Mn-Containing Catalase from Geobacillus sp. WCH70." Catalysts 7.9 (2017): 277.
5. Rues, Ralf-Bernhardt, et al. "Cell-free production of membrane proteins in Escherichia coli lysates for functional and structural studies." Heterologous Expression of Membrane Proteins. Humana Press, New York, NY, 2016. 1-21.
6. Stressler, Timo, et al. "A novel glutamyl (aspartyl)-specific aminopeptidase A from Lactobacillus delbrueckii with promising properties for application." PloS one 11.3 (2016): e0152139.
7. Hsieh, Yi-Lin, et al. "Molecular Characterization of Ethylene Response Sensor 1 (BoERS1) in Bambusa oldhamii." Plant molecular biology reporter 34.2 (2016): 387-398.
8. Stressler, Timo, et al. "A natural variant of arylsulfatase from Kluyveromyces lactis shows no formylglycine modification and has no enzyme activity." Applied microbiology and biotechnology102.6 (2018): 2709-2721.
9. Ewert, Jacob, et al. "Influence of the metal ion on the enzyme activity and kinetics of PepA from Lactobacillus delbrueckii." Enzyme and microbial technology 110 (2018): 69-78.
10. Ewert, Jacob, et al. "Buß, Maren et al.(2019). Specific high affinity interaction of Helicobacter pylori CagL with integrin α V β 6 promotes type IV secretion of CagA into human cells. The FEBS Journal. 10.1111/febs.14962." Enzyme and microbial technology 110 (2018): 69-78.
11. Cho, H.-Y. et al. (2018). The SnRK1-eIFiso4G1 signaling relay regulates the translation of specific mRNAs in Arabidopsis under submergence. New Phytologist. 222. 10.1111/nph.15589.
12. Haeussler, Kristina et al.(2019). Glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase 6-phosphogluconolactonase: Characterization of the Plasmodium vivax enzyme and inhibitor studies. Malaria Journal. 18. 10.1186/s12936-019-2651-z.
13. Moritzer, Ann-Christin et al. (2018). Structure-based switch of regioselectivity in the flavin-dependent tryptophan 6-halogenase Thal. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 294. jbc.RA118.005393. 10.1074/jbc.RA118.005393.
14. Bauer, Westley S et al. “Rapid concentration and elution of malarial antigen histidine-rich protein II using solid phase Zn(II) resin in a simple flow-through pipette tip format.” Biomicrofluidics vol. 11,3 034115. 2 Jun. 2017, doi:10.1063/1.4984788
15. Worm D., et al. (2019) "Expression, purification and stabilization of human serotonin transporter from E. coli" Protein Expression and Purification Volume 164, December 2019, 105479 DOI: 10.1016/j.pep.2019.105479
16. Buß et al. (2019). Specific high affinity interaction of Helicobacter pylori CagL with integrin α V β 6 promotes type IV secretion of CagA into human cells. The FEBS Journal. 10.1111/febs.14962.
17. Voß M. et al.(2019). Arabidopsis immunity regulator EDS1 in a PAD4/SAG101-unbound form is a monomer with an inherently inactive conformation. Journal of Structural Biology. 10.1016/j.jsb.2019.09.007.
18. Matys, S. et al. (2019). Characterization of specifically metal-binding phage clones for selective recovery of cobalt and nickel. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. 103606. 10.1016/j.jece.2019.103606.
19. Coscolín, Cristina et al. (2018). Controlled manipulation of enzyme specificity through immobilization-induced flexibility constraints. Applied Catalysis A: General. 565. 10.1016/j.apcata.2018.08.003.
20. Bauer, Westley S et al. Magnetically-enabled biomarker extraction and delivery system: towards integrated ASSURED diagnostic tools.” The Analyst vol. 142,9 (2017): 1569-1580. doi:10.1039/c7an00278e.
21. Scherr, Thomas et al. (2016). A handheld orbital mixer for processing viscous samples in low resource settings. Anal. Methods. 8. 10.1039/C6AY01636G.
22. Stressler, T. et al. (2016). A Novel Glutamyl (Aspartyl)-Specific Aminopeptidase A from Lactobacillus delbrueckii with Promising Properties for Application. PLOS ONE. 11. e0152139. 10.1371/journal.pone.0152139.
23. Yang, M. et al. (2019). Rational Design of Alginate Lyase from Microbulbifer sp. Q7 to Improve Thermal Stability. Marine Drugs. 17. 378. 10.3390/md17060378.
24. Ewert, J. et al. (2017). Influence of the metal ion on the enzyme activity and kinetics of PepA from Lactobacillus delbrueckii. Enzyme and Microbial Technology. 110. 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2017.10.002.
25. Stressler, T. et al. (2018). A natural variant of arylsulfatase from Kluyveromyces lactis shows no formylglycine modification and has no enzyme activity. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 102. 10.1007/s00253-018-8828-5.
26. Yang, M. et al.(2019). Study on expression and action mode of recombinant alginate lyases based on conserved domains reconstruction. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 103. 10.1007/s00253-018-9502-7.
27. Wag et al. (2020). A near-infrared fluorescent probe quinaldine red lights up the β-sheet structure of amyloid proteins in mouse brain. Biosensors and Bioelectronics. 153. doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2020.112048
28. Tian, Dongrui, et al. "Heterologous expression and molecular binding properties of AofleA, a fucose-specific lectin from nematophagous fungus Arthrobotrys oligospora." International Journal of Biological Macromolecules (2020).
29. Mears, H.V., & Sweeney T.R. (2020) "Mouse Ifit1b is a cap1-RNA binding protein which inhibits mouse coronavirus translation and is regulated by complexing with Ifit1c" Journal of Biological Chemistry
30. Casas et al. (2020) "Decoupling Protein Production from Cell Growth Enhances the Site-Specific Incorporation of Noncanonical Amino Acids inE. coli" ACS Publications
31. Kovalev, K. et al. (2020). High-resolution structural insights into the heliorhodopsin family. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 117. 201915888. 10.1073/pnas.1915888117.
32. Furlan A.G. et al. (2021). A new MMP-mediated prodomain cleavage mechanism to activate bone morphogenetic proteins from the extracellular matrix. The FASEB Journal. 35:e21353 doi.org/10.1096/fj.202001264R.
33. Mayerthaler F. et al. (2021). Intermediary conformations linked to the directionality of the aminoacylation pathway of nonribosomal peptide synthetases. RSC Chem. Biol., 2021, Advance Article doi.org/10.1039/D0CB00220H .
34. Lukas P. (2021). Rekombinante Formen sekretorischer Proteine der Speicheldrüsen des medizinischen Blutegels und deren funktionelle Testung, PHD Thesis, University of Greifswald.
35. Weihou Guo (2021). Overexpression and isolation of the intermediate state of serotonin transporter from Echinococcus multilocularis –‒ the ER localized HSP complexes of the folding trajectory. PhD, University of Hamburg.
36. Zabelskii, D. et al. Structure-based insights into evolution of rhodopsins. Commun Biol 4, 821 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-021-02326-4
37. Huang, C.-J.; Narasimha, G.V.; Chen, Y.-C.; Chen, J.-K.; Dong, G.-C. Measurement of Low Concentration of Micro-Plastics by Detection of Bioaffinity-Induced Particle Retention Using Surface Plasmon Resonance Biosensors. Biosensors 2021, 11, 219. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios11070219
38. Schwäbe et al. Assessment of the Contribution of a Thermodynamic and Mechanical Destabilization of Myosin–Binding Protein C Domain C2 to the Pathomechanism of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy– causing Double Mutation MYBPC3^Δ25bp/D389V 2021 doi: 10.20944/preprints202110.0178.v1
39. Xue et al. Sphingosine-1-phosphate, a novel TREM2 ligand, promotes microglial phagocytosis to protect against ischemic brain injury 2021 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsb.2021.10.012
40. Kolářová, L., et al. (2021), De novo developed protein binders mimicking Interferon lambda signaling. The FEBS Journal. Accepted Author Manuscript. https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.16300
41. Haixia Zhou, et al., Structure of CRL2^Lrr1, the E3 ubiquitin ligase that promotes DNA replication termination in vertebrates, Nucleic Acids Research, 2021;, gkab1174, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab1174
42. Maruszczak et al., Dissecting the interactions of PINK1 with the TOM complex in depolarized mitochondria, BioRxiV pre-print Server https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.13.476189
43. Drwesh L. et al., A network of cytosolic (co)chaperones promotes the biogenesis of mitochondrial signal-anchored outer membrane proteins, (2022) BioRxiV pre-print Server https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.02.15.480587v1
44. Greve J.N. et al., Frameshift mutation S368fs in the gene encoding cytoskeletal β-actin leads to ACTB-associated syndromic thrombocytopenia by impairing actin dynamics, (2022) European Journal of Cell Biology 101 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcb.2022.151216
45. Greve Veronica Teresa Ober et al., Evolution of ligand specificity of protein kinase A isoforms in the phylum Euglenozoa, (2022) PhD Thesis, University of Munich
46. Bagavant H. et al., Systemic immune response to vimentin and granuloma formation in a model of pulmonary sarcoidosis, (2022) Journal of Translational Autoimmunity
47. Maruszczak K. K. et al., The role of the individual TOM subunits in the association of PINK1 with depolarized mitochondria (2022) Journal of Molecular Medicine
48. Kronenberg et al., Serological Assays for Alveolar and Cystic Echinococcosis—A Comparative Multi-Test Study in Switzerland and Kyrgyzstan (2022) Pathogens
49. Deutschmann , The interplay of lipids and respiratory enzymes in synthetic ATP producing systems (2022) PhD Thesis, University of Bern
50. Márió M., Rekombináns fehérje szubsztrátok alkalmazása HIV-1 és SARS-CoV-2 proteázok vizsgálatára és egy bioréteg interferometria-alapú mérési módszer kidolgozására (2022) PhD Thesis, DEBRECENI EGYETEM MOLEKULÁRIS SEJT- ÉS IMMUNBIOLÓGIAI DOKTORI ISKOLA
51. Voß M., , Crucial steps on the way to a comprehensive structural understanding of the plant proteins EDS1 and PAD4 and their role in innate immunity (2022) PhD Thesis, University of Cologne